On 01/19/2010 06:15 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Anthony Liguori (anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
On 01/19/2010 02:03 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
* Anthony Liguori (anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
I'm very much against having -cpu Nehalem. The whole point of this is
to make things easier for a user and for most of the users I've
encountered, -cpu Nehalem is just as obscure as -cpu
qemu64,-sse3,+vmx,...
What name will these users know? FWIW, it makes sense to me as it is.
Whatever is in /proc/cpuinfo.
That doesn't exactly generalize to families w/ similar cpuid features.
Intel(R) Xeon(R) {E,L,X}{74,55}**
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 {Duo,Quad,Extreme} ...
Then we should key off of family and model.
So -cpu AMD_Family_10h
or something like that. At least that is discoverable by a user.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
