Re: [RFC PATCH v4 13/36] i386/tdx: Validate TD attributes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 12:19:51PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 5/23/2022 5:39 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > So, how is this supposed to work?  Patch #2 introduces attributes as
> > user-settable property.  So do users have to manually figure and pass
> > the correct value, so the check passes?  Specifically the fixed1 check?
> > 
> > I think 'attributes' should not be user-settable in the first place.
> > Each feature-bit which is actually user-settable (and not already
> > covered by another option like pmu) should be a separate attribute for
> > tdx-object.  Then the tdx code can create attributes from hardware
> > capabilities and user settings.
> 
> In patch #2, tdx-guest.attributes is defined as a field to hold a 64 bits
> value of attributes but it doesn't provide any getter/setter for it. So it's
> *not* user-settable.

Ok.  Why it is declared as object property in the first place then?

take care,
  Gerd




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux