On 4/29/22 23:00, Sean Christopherson wrote:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
index 05cb0bcbf662..eaef31462bbe 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
@@ -157,6 +157,13 @@ int kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_refresh(struct kvm *kvm, struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc,
if (page_offset + len > PAGE_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * If another task is refreshing the cache, wait for it to complete.
+ * There is no guarantee that concurrent refreshes will see the same
+ * gpa, memslots generation, etc..., so they must be fully serialized.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&gpc->refresh_lock);
+
write_lock_irq(&gpc->lock);
old_pfn = gpc->pfn;
@@ -248,6 +255,8 @@ int kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_refresh(struct kvm *kvm, struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc,
out:
write_unlock_irq(&gpc->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&gpc->refresh_lock);
+
gpc_release_pfn_and_khva(kvm, old_pfn, old_khva);
return ret;
Does kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_unmap also need to take the mutex, to avoid
the WARN_ON(gpc->valid)?
Paolo
