The third patch is buggy, please ignore it. I will post a new version. Sorry for the noise. On 10/5/2022 7:57 pm, Like Xu wrote:
From: Like Xu<likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx> If the number of AMD gp counters continues to grow, the code will be very clumsy and the switch-case design of inline get_gp_pmc_amd() will also bloat the kernel text size. The target code is taught to manage two groups of MSRs, each representing a different version of the AMD PMU counter MSRs. The MSR addresses of each group are contiguous, with no holes, and there is no intersection between two sets of addresses, but they are discrete in functionality by design like this: [Group A : All counter MSRs are tightly bound to all event select MSRs ] MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 0xc0010000 MSR_K7_EVNTSELi 0xc0010000 + i ... MSR_K7_EVNTSEL3 0xc0010003 MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 0xc0010004 MSR_K7_PERFCTRi 0xc0010004 + i ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3 0xc0010007 [Group B : The counter MSRs are interleaved with the event select MSRs ] MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 0xc0010200 MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0 (0xc0010200 + 1) ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTLi (0xc0010200 + 2 * i) MSR_F15H_PERF_CTRi (0xc0010200 + 2 * i + 1) ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL5 (0xc0010200 + 2 * 5) MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5 (0xc0010200 + 2 * 5 + 1) Rewrite get_gp_pmc_amd() in this way: first determine which group of registers is accessed by the pass-in 'msr' address, then determine which msr 'base' is referenced by 'type', applying different address scaling ratios separately, and finally get the pmc_idx. If the 'base' does not match its 'type', it continues to remain invalid. Signed-off-by: Like Xu<likexu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
