Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> kvm didn't clear irqfd counter on deassign, as a result we could get a
> spurious interrupt when irqfd is assigned back. this leads to poor
> performance and, in theory, guest crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 62e4cd9..a9d3fc6 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -72,12 +72,13 @@ static void
> irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(work, struct _irqfd, shutdown);
> + u64 cnt;
>
> /*
> * Synchronize with the wait-queue and unhook ourselves to prevent
> * further events.
> */
> - remove_wait_queue(irqfd->wqh, &irqfd->wait);
> + eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(irqfd->eventfd, &irqfd->wait, &cnt);
>
> /*
> * We know no new events will be scheduled at this point, so block
For kvm-kmod, I'm fighting with compat support for
eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue. I basically have a solution for kernels
with CONFIG_KPROBES enabled (I need to look up unexported
__wake_up_locked[_key]), but there will also be target kernels that do
not have this. So there are three options for that case:
- Warn the user and fall back to the old racy approach
- (Somehow) disable KVM subsystems that use eventfd
- Refuse to start KVM
As far as I understood, irqfd is interesting for device assignment and
now also for vhost, right? What about ioeventfd? I just wonder how broad
the impact of a broken or non-existent eventfd subsystem for kvm-kmod
is. Any thoughts welcome.
Jan
PS: If anyone forgot why Avi handed over this job, you should now
remember why. :)
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
