On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 5:06 PM Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 13:59 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 4/5/22 21:49, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > TDX supports shutting down the TDX module at any time during its
> > > lifetime. After TDX module is shut down, no further SEAMCALL can be
> > > made on any logical cpu.
> >
> > Is this strictly true?
> >
> > I thought SEAMCALLs were used for the P-SEAMLDR too.
>
> Sorry will change to no TDX module SEAMCALL can be made on any logical cpu.
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > +/* Data structure to make SEAMCALL on multiple CPUs concurrently */
> > > +struct seamcall_ctx {
> > > + u64 fn;
> > > + u64 rcx;
> > > + u64 rdx;
> > > + u64 r8;
> > > + u64 r9;
> > > + atomic_t err;
> > > + u64 seamcall_ret;
> > > + struct tdx_module_output out;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static void seamcall_smp_call_function(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct seamcall_ctx *sc = data;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = seamcall(sc->fn, sc->rcx, sc->rdx, sc->r8, sc->r9,
> > > + &sc->seamcall_ret, &sc->out);
Are the seamcall_ret and out fields in seamcall_ctx going to be used?
Right now it looks like no one is going to read them.
If they are going to be used then this is going to cause a race since
the different CPUs are going to write concurrently to the same address
inside seamcall().
We should either use local memory and write using atomic_set like the
case for the err field or hard code NULL at the call site if they are
not going to be used.
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + atomic_set(&sc->err, ret);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Call the SEAMCALL on all online cpus concurrently.
> > > + * Return error if SEAMCALL fails on any cpu.
> > > + */
> > > +static int seamcall_on_each_cpu(struct seamcall_ctx *sc)
> > > +{
> > > + on_each_cpu(seamcall_smp_call_function, sc, true);
> > > + return atomic_read(&sc->err);
> > > +}
> >
> > Why bother returning something that's not read?
>
> It's not needed. I'll make it void.
>
> Caller can check seamcall_ctx::err directly if they want to know whether any
> error happened.
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Kai
>
>
Sagi
