On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:33AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:28:15AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> If so, I will try to write something like this the next days. Will > >>>> surely appreciate your review afterwards! > >>> Sounds good! > >>> > >> Here we go, find the commit inlined below. You may be primarily > >> interested in kvm_synchronize_sched_expedited() and the helper thread > >> function kvm_rcu_sync_thread. As I use a dedicated thread I simplified > >> some parts compared to upstream. Light testing indicates that it works. > > > > Cool!!! > > > > Have you had a chance to run rcutorture on this implementation? > > > > No, this would mean backporting rcutorture - is it straightforward > (limited time...)? If you aren't backporting too far, the following commit should do it for you: 804bb8370522a569bd3a732b9de5fbd55e26f155 I do not believe that you should need to run rcutorture on all possible old versions -- instead, pick some recent ones. Please let me know if this does not work out for you. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
