Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 11:18:51 -0700
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, yang.zhong@xxxxxxxxx, drjones@xxxxxxxxxx, ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx, aaronlewis@xxxxxxxxxx, wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx, michael.roth@xxxxxxx, qperret@xxxxxxxxxx, Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, Marc Orr <marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx>, Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>, nikunj@xxxxxxx, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Austin Diviness <diviness@xxxxxxxxxx>, shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <e4a84dfe-2397-0881-b6bd-1cb2b2d5904e@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220511000811.384766-1-vannapurve@google.com> <e4a84dfe-2397-0881-b6bd-1cb2b2d5904e@linuxfoundation.org>

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:04 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> + shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Adding  my correct kernel.org address. Please make sure to run
> get_maintainers.pl to get the right addresses for miantianers.
>

Thanks Shuah for the feedback. Apologies for the typo in the email address.

I will address the comments in the next version.

Regards,
Vishal

References:
- [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
  - From: Vishal Annapurve
- Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
  - From: Shuah Khan

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Stop using iommu_present()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
Next by thread: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 0/8] selftests: KVM: selftests for fd-based approach of supporting private memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]