On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 15:20 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> 'struct hv_vp_assist_page' definition doesn't match TLFS. Also, define
> 'struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control' and use it instead of opaque
> '__u64'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/evmcs.h | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/evmcs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/evmcs.h
> index b6067b555110..9c965ba73dec 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/evmcs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/evmcs.h
> @@ -20,14 +20,26 @@
>
> extern bool enable_evmcs;
>
> +struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control {
> + struct {
> + __u32 directhypercall:1;
> + __u32 reserved:31;
> + } features;
> + struct {
> + __u32 reserved;
> + } hypercallControls;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* Define virtual processor assist page structure. */
> struct hv_vp_assist_page {
> __u32 apic_assist;
> - __u32 reserved;
> - __u64 vtl_control[2];
> - __u64 nested_enlightenments_control[2];
> - __u32 enlighten_vmentry;
> + __u32 reserved1;
> + __u64 vtl_control[3];
> + struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control nested_control;
> + __u8 enlighten_vmentry;
> + __u8 reserved2[7];
> __u64 current_nested_vmcs;
> -};
> +} __packed;
>
> struct hv_enlightened_vmcs {
> u32 revision_id;
Seems to match the spec.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
