Re: [RFC PATCH v6 034/104] KVM: x86/mmu: Add address conversion functions for TDX shared bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 11:14 -0700, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> TDX repurposes one GPA bits (51 bit or 47 bit based on configuration) to
> indicate the GPA is private(if cleared) or shared (if set) with VMM.  If
> GPA.shared is set, GPA is converted existing conventional EPT pointed by
> EPTP.  If GPA.shared bit is cleared, GPA is converted by Secure-EPT(S-EPT)
> TDX module manages.  VMM has to issue SEAM call to TDX module to operate on
> S-EPT.  e.g. populating/zapping guest page or shadow page by TDH.PAGE.{ADD,
> REMOVE} for guest page, TDH.PAGE.SEPT.{ADD, REMOVE} S-EPT etc.
> 
> Several hooks needs to be added to KVM MMU to support TDX.  Add a function
> to check if KVM MMU is running for TDX and several functions for address
> conversation between private-GPA and shared-GPA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h              | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          |  6 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 60a97ae55972..88fd3fd3e1a0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1251,7 +1251,9 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>  	 */
>  	u32 max_vcpu_ids;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_PRIVATE
>  	gfn_t gfn_shared_mask;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_vm_stat {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 7e258cc94152..3647035a147e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -373,4 +373,36 @@ static inline gpa_t kvm_translate_gpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		return gpa;
>  	return translate_nested_gpa(vcpu, gpa, access, exception);
>  }
> +
> +static inline gfn_t kvm_gfn_shared_mask(const struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MMU_PRIVATE
> +	return kvm->arch.gfn_shared_mask;
> +#else
> +	return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline gfn_t kvm_gfn_shared(const struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	return gfn | kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
> +}
> +
> +static inline gfn_t kvm_gfn_private(const struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	return gfn & ~kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
> +}
> +
> +static inline gpa_t kvm_gpa_private(const struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa)
> +{
> +	return gpa & ~gfn_to_gpa(kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_is_private_gpa(const struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa)
> +{
> +	gfn_t mask = kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
> +
> +	return mask && !(gpa_to_gfn(gpa) & mask);
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 909372762363..d1c37295bb6e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -264,8 +264,10 @@ static void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>  {
>  	int ret = -ENOTSUPP;
>  
> -	if (range && kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush_with_range)
> +	if (range && kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range()) {
> +		/* Callback should flush both private GFN and shared GFN. */
>  		ret = static_call(kvm_x86_tlb_remote_flush_with_range)(kvm, range);
> +	}

??

>  
>  	if (ret)
>  		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> @@ -4048,7 +4050,7 @@ static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
>  	unsigned long mmu_seq;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	fault->gfn = fault->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	fault->gfn = gpa_to_gfn(fault->addr) & ~kvm_gfn_shared_mask(vcpu->kvm);
>  	fault->slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, fault->gfn);
>  
>  	if (page_fault_handle_page_track(vcpu, fault))

As I said in previous version, this above change alone is broken:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1646422845.git.isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx/T/#mcd5c235e3577f5129810f3183f151a1c5f63466e

Why cannot this patch be merged to other patch(es) which truly adds
private/shared mapping support?

Or did I get something wrong?

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux