On Thu, May 05, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> @@ -63,11 +63,12 @@ static void stats_test(int stats_fd)
> "Descriptor block is overlapped with data block");
>
> /* Read kvm stats descriptors */
> - stats_desc = read_stats_desc(stats_fd, &header);
> + stats_desc = read_stats_descriptors(stats_fd, &header);
>
> /* Sanity check for fields in descriptors */
> for (i = 0; i < header.num_desc; ++i) {
> - pdesc = (void *)stats_desc + i * size_desc;
> + pdesc = get_stats_descriptor(stats_desc, i, &header);
> +
> /* Check type,unit,base boundaries */
> TEST_ASSERT((pdesc->flags & KVM_STATS_TYPE_MASK)
> <= KVM_STATS_TYPE_MAX, "Unknown KVM stats type");
Drat, I missed two instances! And more on top...
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_binary_stats_test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_binary_stats_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_binary_stats_test.c
index 6252e3d6e964..6b5ce270b890 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_binary_stats_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_binary_stats_test.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void stats_test(int stats_fd)
"Data size is not correct");
/* Check stats offset */
for (i = 0; i < header.num_desc; ++i) {
- pdesc = (void *)stats_desc + i * size_desc;
+ pdesc = get_stats_descriptor(stats_desc, i, &header);
TEST_ASSERT(pdesc->offset < size_data,
"Invalid offset (%u) for stats: %s",
pdesc->offset, pdesc->name);
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void stats_test(int stats_fd)
/* Read kvm stats data one by one */
size_data = 0;
for (i = 0; i < header.num_desc; ++i) {
- pdesc = (void *)stats_desc + i * size_desc;
+ pdesc = get_stats_descriptor(stats_desc, i, &header);
ret = pread(stats_fd, stats_data,
pdesc->size * sizeof(*stats_data),
header.data_offset + size_data);
base-commit: 84185927b3e27502a70685848adffbe56a804d98
--
