Re: [PATCH] x86: Function missing integer return value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Function missing integer return value
From: Li kunyu <kunyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 23:28:02 +0800
Cc: bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx, joro@xxxxxxxxxx, kunyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <fdd2d7e2-cf7c-4bfd-39d2-af5a3cf60b26@maciej.szmigiero.name>
References: <fdd2d7e2-cf7c-4bfd-39d2-af5a3cf60b26@maciej.szmigiero.name>

Hello, senior, I've considered break before, but I'm not sure if I want to execute more instructions.   
Query break executed one more NOP instruction.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] x86: Function missing integer return value
  - From: Maciej S. Szmigiero

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: Implement dirty quota-based throttling of vcpus
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: unify VMX instruction error reporting
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: Function missing integer return value
Next by thread: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] s390x: More storage key instruction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux