Update 'ret' with the return value of _kvm_device_access() prior to asserting that ret is non-zero. In the current code base, the flaw is benign as 'ret' is guaranteed to be -EBUSY from the previous run_vcpu(), which also means that errno==EBUSY prior to _kvm_device_access(), thus the "errno == EFAULT" part of the assert means that a false negative is impossible (unless the kernel is being truly mean and spuriously setting errno=EFAULT while returning success). Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c index 34379c98d2f4..0f046e3e953d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c @@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ static void test_v3_new_redist_regions(void) v = vm_gic_create_with_vcpus(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3, NR_VCPUS); subtest_v3_redist_regions(&v); - _kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR, - KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION, dummy, true); + ret = _kvm_device_access(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR, + KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGION, dummy, true); TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EFAULT, "register a third region allowing to cover the 4 vcpus"); -- 2.36.0.464.gb9c8b46e94-goog
