On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:33:40PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 03 May 2022 19:49:13 +0100, > Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 10:24 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 03 May 2022 00:38:44 +0100, > > > Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Continuing the discussion from [1], the series tries to add support > > > > for the userspace to elect the hypercall services that it wishes > > > > to expose to the guest, rather than the guest discovering them > > > > unconditionally. The idea employed by the series was taken from > > > > [1] as suggested by Marc Z. > > > > > > As it took some time to get there, and that there was still a bunch of > > > things to address, I've taken the liberty to apply my own fixes to the > > > series. > > > > > > Please have a look at [1], and let me know if you're OK with the > > > result. If you are, I'll merge the series for 5.19. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > M. > > > > > Thank you for speeding up the process; appreciate it. However, the > > series's selftest patches have a dependency on Oliver's > > PSCI_SYSTEM_SUSPEND's selftest patches [1][2]. Can we pull them in > > too? Posted, BTW. http://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20220504032446.4133305-1-oupton@xxxxxxxxxx > > 2. Patch-2/9, arm_hypercall.h, clear all the macros in this patch > > itself instead of doing it in increments (unless there's some reason > > that I'm missing)? > > Ah, rebasing leftovers, now gone. > > I've pushed an updated branch again, please have a look. Series looks good with your additions. For the pile: Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
