On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 4:25 AM Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We should treat SBI HFENCE calls as NOPs until nested virtualization > is supported by KVM RISC-V. This will help us test booting a hypervisor > under KVM RISC-V. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > index 0f217365c287..3c1dcd38358e 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_replace.c > @@ -117,7 +117,11 @@ static int kvm_sbi_ext_rfence_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID: > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_VVMA: > case SBI_EXT_RFENCE_REMOTE_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID: > - /* TODO: implement for nested hypervisor case */ > + /* > + * Until nested virtualization is implemented, the > + * SBI HFENCE calls should be treated as NOPs > + */ > + break; > default: > ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > } > -- > 2.25.1 > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Regards, Atish