On 4/29/22 19:27, Peter Gonda wrote:
Ah yes I missed that. I would suggest `role = SEV_NR_MIGRATION_ROLES` or something else instead of role++ to avoid leaking this implementation detail outside of the function signature / enum.
Sure. Paolo
On 4/29/22 19:27, Peter Gonda wrote:
Ah yes I missed that. I would suggest `role = SEV_NR_MIGRATION_ROLES` or something else instead of role++ to avoid leaking this implementation detail outside of the function signature / enum.
Sure. Paolo
|