Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Use current rather than snapshotted TSC frequency if it is constant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 16:09 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Anton,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on kvm/master]
> [also build test WARNING on mst-vhost/linux-next v5.18-rc3 next-20220420]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anton-Romanov/KVM-x86-Use-current-rather-than-snapshotted-TSC-frequency-if-it-is-constant/20220421-090221
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git master
> config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220421/202204211558.rjkmRfSe-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-20) 11.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/c60b3070bd6e7e804de118dac10002e4f5f714a6
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Anton-Romanov/KVM-x86-Use-current-rather-than-snapshotted-TSC-frequency-if-it-is-constant/20220421-090221
>         git checkout c60b3070bd6e7e804de118dac10002e4f5f714a6
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/x86/kvm/
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function '__get_kvmclock':
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2936:17: error: expected expression before 'struct'
>     2936 |                 struct timespec64 ts;
>          |                 ^~~~~~
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2933:9: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>     2933 |         if (ka->use_master_clock &&

The bot is right, looks like '{' got removed by a mistake, I didn't notice.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky




>          |         ^~
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2938:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'if'
>     2938 |                 if (kvm_get_walltime_and_clockread(&ts, &data->host_tsc)) {
>          |                 ^~
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2938:53: error: 'ts' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'tms'?
>     2938 |                 if (kvm_get_walltime_and_clockread(&ts, &data->host_tsc)) {
>          |                                                     ^~
>          |                                                     tms
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2938:53: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: At top level:
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2952:11: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'else'
>     2952 |         } else {
>          |           ^~~~
>    In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:6,
>                     from include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/kvm_host.h:7,
>                     from arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:19:
>    include/linux/preempt.h:219:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'do'
>      219 | do { \
>          | ^~
>    include/linux/smp.h:268:33: note: in expansion of macro 'preempt_enable'
>      268 | #define put_cpu()               preempt_enable()
>          |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2956:9: note: in expansion of macro 'put_cpu'
>     2956 |         put_cpu();
>          |         ^~~~~~~
>    include/linux/preempt.h:223:3: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
>      223 | } while (0)
>          |   ^~~~~
>    include/linux/smp.h:268:33: note: in expansion of macro 'preempt_enable'
>      268 | #define put_cpu()               preempt_enable()
>          |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2956:9: note: in expansion of macro 'put_cpu'
>     2956 |         put_cpu();
>          |         ^~~~~~~
>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2957:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
>     2957 | }
>          | ^
> 
> 
> vim +/if +2933 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> 
>   2922	
>   2923	/* Called within read_seqcount_begin/retry for kvm->pvclock_sc.  */
>   2924	static void __get_kvmclock(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clock_data *data)
>   2925	{
>   2926		struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
>   2927		struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
>   2928	
>   2929		/* both __this_cpu_read() and rdtsc() should be on the same cpu */
>   2930		get_cpu();
>   2931	
>   2932		data->flags = 0;
> > 2933		if (ka->use_master_clock &&
>   2934			(static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) || __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz)))
>   2935	#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>   2936			struct timespec64 ts;
>   2937	
>   2938			if (kvm_get_walltime_and_clockread(&ts, &data->host_tsc)) {
>   2939				data->realtime = ts.tv_nsec + NSEC_PER_SEC * ts.tv_sec;
>   2940				data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_REALTIME | KVM_CLOCK_HOST_TSC;
>   2941			} else
>   2942	#endif
>   2943			data->host_tsc = rdtsc();
>   2944	
>   2945			data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE;
>   2946			hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = ka->master_cycle_now;
>   2947			hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
>   2948			kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, get_cpu_tsc_khz() * 1000LL,
>   2949					   &hv_clock.tsc_shift,
>   2950					   &hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
>   2951			data->clock = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, data->host_tsc);
>   2952		} else {
>   2953			data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
>   2954		}
>   2955	
>   2956		put_cpu();
>   2957	}
>   2958	
> 





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux