Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: PPC: Emulate trap SRR1 flags properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10.01.2010, at 13:34, Avi Kivity wrote:

> On 01/08/2010 09:37 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, but I'd rather minimize the behavioral changes as long as we can't test it.
>>>     
>> Right. That's why the semantics of "flags" are Book3S specific right now and as such the comment is correct.
>> 
>> The behavioral change we need to do later is to take the ESR setting into queue_program, but that should wait until after someone has a board to test things on again ;-). The reminder that we need to do this is hereby archived in the mails :).
>>   
> 
> What's the conclusion here?  Do we need a respin or is this good enough?

>From my point of view this is good. Hollis and I were just both agreeing that it would be nice to move BookE to a similar concept. That really isn't in the scope of this series though.

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux