On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:45:25AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:10:36 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -1732,8 +1705,30 @@ static int vfio_pci_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > static int vfio_pci_vf_init(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *cur;
> > + struct pci_dev *physfn;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + if (pdev->is_virtfn) {
> > + /*
> > + * If this VF was created by our vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure()
> > + * then we can find the PF vfio_pci_core_device now, and due to
> > + * the locking in pci_disable_sriov() it cannot change until
> > + * this VF device driver is removed.
> > + */
> > + physfn = pci_physfn(vdev->pdev);
> > + mutex_lock(&vfio_pci_sriov_pfs_mutex);
> > + list_for_each_entry (cur, &vfio_pci_sriov_pfs, sriov_pfs_item) {
> ^
> |
> checkpatch noted the space here ----
Yeah, I usually ignore that.. we don't write "for()" after all..
> Fixed on commit, looks good otherwise. Applied to vfio for-linus
> branch for v5.18. Thanks,
Thanks!
Jason
