On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:48:24AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 03:39:19PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 13:43 -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > > + struct zpci_fib fib = {};
> >
> > Hmm this one uses '{}' as initializer while all current callers of
> > zpci_mod_fc() use '{0}'. As far as I know the empty braces are a GNU
> > extension so should work for the kernel but for consistency I'd go with
> > '{0}' or possibly '{.foo = bar, ...}' where that is more readable.
> > There too uninitialized fields will be set to 0. Unless of course there
> > is a conflicting KVM convention that I don't know about.
>
> {} is not a GNU extension, it is the preferred way to write it.
>
> The standard has a weird distinction between {} and {0} that results
> in different behavior.
Whoever cares: details are described in "6.7.8 Initialization" within
the C standard.
