Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive EPT violation RWX bits from EPTE RWX bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive EPT violation RWX bits from EPTE RWX bits
From: "SU Hang" <darcy.sh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:55:27 +0800
Cc: <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "SU Hang" <darcy.sh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Yj0NOQOYEAG+Dz7+@google.com>
References: <Yj0NOQOYEAG+Dz7+@google.com>

I sincerely apologize to you and Palo for making this mistake due to my
negligence and lack of testing. Since the patches only care about macro
substitutions and no function changes, this makes me sloppy. Now I realize my
mistake.

Ashamed Hang

References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: X86: use EPT_VIOLATION_* instead of 0x7
  - From: Sean Christopherson

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/47] Address Space Isolation for KVM
Next by Date: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix the return type of kvm_age_rmapp
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: X86: use EPT_VIOLATION_* instead of 0x7
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_* definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux