On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 12:12 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > > - shadow_present_mask = has_exec_only ? 0ull : > > > VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK; > > > + shadow_present_mask = > > > + (has_exec_only ? 0ull : VMX_EPT_READABLE_MASK) | > > > init_value; > > > > This change doesn't seem make any sense. Why should "Suppress #VE" bit be > > set > > for a present PTE? > > Because W or NX violation also needs #VE. Although the name uses present, > it's > actually readable. Yeah I forgot this. Thanks! -- Thanks, -Kai
