ping,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 16:19, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When the "nopv" command line parameter is used, it should not waste
> memory for kvmclock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> index c5caa73..16333ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void __init kvmclock_init_mem(void)
>
> static int __init kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo(void)
> {
> - if (!kvm_para_available() || !kvmclock)
> + if (!kvm_para_available() || !kvmclock || nopv)
> return 0;
>
> kvmclock_init_mem();
> --
> 2.7.4
>
