On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:51:38PM +1200,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 09:29 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> > On 4/5/2022 8:58 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 3/4/22 20:48, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > + td_params->attributes = init_vm->attributes;
> > > > + if (td_params->attributes & TDX_TD_ATTRIBUTE_PERFMON) {
> > > > + pr_warn("TD doesn't support perfmon. KVM needs to save/restore "
> > > > + "host perf registers properly.\n");
> > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Why does KVM have to hardcode this (and LBR/AMX below)? Is the level of
> > > hardware support available from tdx_caps, for example through the CPUID
> > > configs (0xA for this one, 0xD for LBR and AMX)?
> >
> > It's wrong code. PMU is allowed.
> >
> > AMX and LBR are disallowed because and the time we wrote the codes they
> > are not supported by KVM. Now AMX should be allowed, but (arch-)LBR
> > should be still blocked until KVM merges arch-LBR support.
>
> I think Isaku's idea is we don't support them in the first submission?
>
> If so as I suggested, we should add a TODO in comment..
Sure, will add a TODO comment.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
