On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 15:52 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 4/7/22 01:43, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > + if (kvm_gfn_stolen_mask(vcpu->kvm)) {
> > Please get rid of kvm_gfn_stolen_mask().
> >
>
> Kai, please follow the other reviews that I have posted in the last few
> days.
>
> Paolo
>
Do you mean below reply?
"I think use of kvm_gfn_stolen_mask() should be minimized anyway. I
would rename it to to kvm_{gfn,gpa}_private_mask and not return bool."
I also mean we should not use kvm_gfn_stolen_mask(). I don't have opinion on
the new name. Perhaps kvm_is_protected_vm() is my preference though.
