Add an mmu_notifier for protected VMs. The callback function is
triggered when the mm is torn down, and will attempt to convert all
protected vCPUs to non-protected. This allows the mm teardown to use
the destroy page UVC instead of export.
Also make KVM select CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER, needed to use mmu_notifiers.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 5 ++++-
arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a22c9266ea05..1bccb8561ba9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/kvm.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <asm/debug.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/fpu/api.h>
@@ -921,6 +922,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_pv {
u64 guest_len;
unsigned long stor_base;
void *stor_var;
+ struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
};
struct kvm_arch{
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
index 2e84d3922f7c..33f4ff909476 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ config KVM
select SRCU
select KVM_VFIO
select INTERVAL_TREE
+ select MMU_NOTIFIER
help
Support hosting paravirtualized guest machines using the SIE
virtualization capability on the mainframe. This should work
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 21fcca09e9bf..446f89db93a1 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/lowcore.h>
@@ -2833,8 +2834,10 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
* can mess with the pv state. To avoid lockdep_assert_held from
* complaining we do not use kvm_s390_pv_is_protected.
*/
- if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm)) {
kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &rc, &rrc);
+ mmu_notifier_unregister(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+ }
debug_unregister(kvm->arch.dbf);
free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.sie_page2);
if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index 76ef33a277d3..788b96b36931 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <asm/mman.h>
#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include "kvm-s390.h"
static void kvm_s390_clear_pv_state(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -192,6 +193,26 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
return -EIO;
}
+static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = container_of(subscription, struct kvm, arch.pv.mmu_notifier);
+ u16 dummy;
+
+ /*
+ * No locking is needed since this is the last thread of the last user of this
+ * struct mm.
+ * When the struct kvm gets deinitialized, this notifier is also
+ * unregistered. This means that if this notifier runs, then the
+ * struct kvm is still valid.
+ */
+ kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+ .release = kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release,
+};
+
int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
{
struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
@@ -233,6 +254,11 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
return -EIO;
}
kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
+ /* Add the notifier only once. No races because we hold kvm->lock */
+ if (kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops != &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops) {
+ kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops;
+ mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
