Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_* definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_* definition
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:16 +0000
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220329030108.97341-2-darcy.sh@antgroup.com>
References: <20220329030108.97341-1-darcy.sh@antgroup.com> <20220329030108.97341-2-darcy.sh@antgroup.com>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, SU Hang wrote:
> Using self-expressing macro definition EPT_VIOLATION_GVA_VALIDATION

Nit, this still refers to the name used in v1.  With that fixed (Paolo might do
it for you :-) ),

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: Replace magic number with readable macro
  - From: SU Hang
- [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_* definition
  - From: SU Hang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: KVM: Describe guest TSC scaling in migration algorithm
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: replace 0x180 with EPT_VIOLATION_* definition
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive EPT violation RWX bits from EPTE RWX bits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux