On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > So, what's the plan here: is your patch set Sean considered to supersede > Maxim's earlier proposed changes or will you post an updated patch set > incorporating at least some of them? Next step is to reach a consensus on how we want to solve the problem (or if we can't reach consensus, until Paolo uses his special powers). I definitely won't post anything new until there's more conversation. > I am asking because I have a series that touches the same general area > of KVM [1] and would preferably have it based on the final form of the > event injection code to avoid unforeseen negative interactions between > these changes. I don't think you need to do anything, at a glance your changes are orthogonal even though they have similar themes. Any conflicts should be minor.