On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:55 AM Isaku Yamahata
<isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:28:42AM -0700,
> Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 11:50 AM <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > @@ -509,6 +512,37 @@ void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> > > vcpu->kvm->vm_bugged = true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +u64 __tdx_vcpu_run(hpa_t tdvpr, void *regs, u32 regs_mask);
> > > +
> > > +static noinstr void tdx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > + struct vcpu_tdx *tdx)
> > > +{
> > > + guest_enter_irqoff();
> > > + tdx->exit_reason.full = __tdx_vcpu_run(tdx->tdvpr.pa, vcpu->arch.regs, 0);
> > > + guest_exit_irqoff();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +fastpath_t tdx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(vcpu->kvm->vm_bugged)) {
> > > + tdx->exit_reason.full = TDX_NON_RECOVERABLE_VCPU;
> > > + return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + trace_kvm_entry(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + tdx_vcpu_enter_exit(vcpu, tdx);
> > > +
> > > + vcpu->arch.regs_avail &= ~VMX_REGS_LAZY_LOAD_SET;
> > > + trace_kvm_exit(vcpu, KVM_ISA_VMX);
> > > +
> > > + if (tdx->exit_reason.error || tdx->exit_reason.non_recoverable)
> > > + return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
> >
> > Looks like the above if statement has no effect. Just checking if this
> > is intentional.
>
> I'm not sure if I get your point. tdx->exit_reason is updated by the above
> tdx_cpu_enter_exit(). So it makes sense to check .error or .non_recoverable.
> --
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
What I mean is, if there is an error, it returns EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE
but if there is no error, it still returns EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE.
The code is like below, the if-statement might be there as a
placeholder to check errors but it has no impact on what is returned
from this function.
if (tdx->exit_reason.error || tdx->exit_reason.non_recoverable)
return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE;
