On 13.03.22 19:33, James Turner wrote: > >> My understanding at this point is that the root problem is probably >> not in the Linux kernel but rather something else (e.g. the machine >> firmware or AMD Windows driver) and that the change in f9b7f3703ff9 >> ("drm/amdgpu/acpi: make ATPX/ATCS structures global (v2)") simply >> exposed the underlying problem. FWIW: that in the end is irrelevant when it comes to the Linux kernel's 'no regressions' rule. For details see: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst That being said: sometimes for the greater good it's better to not insist on that. And I guess that might be the case here. > I'm not sure where to go from here. This issue isn't much of a concern> for me anymore, since blacklisting `amdgpu` works for my machine. At> this point, my understanding is that the root problem needs to be fixed> in AMD's Windows GPU driver or Dell's firmware, not the Linux kernel. If> any of the AMD developers on this thread would like to forward it to the> AMD Windows driver team, I'd be happy to work with AMD to fix the issue> properly. In that case I'll drop it from the list of regressions, unless what I wrote above makes you change your mind. #regzbot invalid: firmware issue exposed by kernel change, user seems to be happy with a workaround Thx everyone who participated in handling this. Ciao, Thorsten