Re: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:41:25 -0700
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgg@xxxxxxxxxx, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx, kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx, yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <164727326053.17467.1731353533389014796.stgit@omen>
References: <164727326053.17467.1731353533389014796.stgit@omen>

Please stop the factually incorrect and misleading "vendor drivers"
term.  It is a driver for a specific piece of harware, which has
absolutely nothing to do with a vendor and with an open spec can
easily support devices from multiple vendors.

References:
- [PATCH] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers
  - From: Alex Williamson

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 02/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: MMIO-based LPI invalidation and co
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux