On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem? Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot easily reproduce it, then please don't spend too long over it. I've never noticed it myself (perhaps because my workaday loads are too light, and my testing loads too heavy): I was just judging by the content of Rik's patch. Rik cites AIM7 in his description, but perhaps someone knows an easier way to demonstrate it; though I was more interested in whether it also fixes the problem you saw. > > You say that the patch applies and builds correctly on 2.6.31.9 and > 2.6.32.3. I would like to test it with 2.6.32.3, but I didn't find the > source code of it in [1]. It would have to be in another path? Umm, may I pretend that, as we approach the New Year, I was gazing into my crystal ball? Or should I just admit to a stupid typo? Such a dilemma, but I'll go for honesty: 2.6.32.2, sorry about that! > > Thanks for your reply and the patch. Thanks go to Rik for the patch. And thanks for your report and testing, but please don't put yourself out over it: the patch already looks good, and I think it should go to -stable with or without the commendation of whether it works for you. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
