Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:03:33 +0100
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kieran Bingham <kbingham@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3221c2385e1148fe0ee77d4717b52726e1db9d8d.camel@redhat.com>
References: <20210811122927.900604-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <20210811122927.900604-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <YTECUaPa9kySQxRX@google.com> <0cdac80177eea408b7e316bd1fc4c0c5839ba1d4.camel@redhat.com> <YifoysEvfnQgq59A@google.com> <3221c2385e1148fe0ee77d4717b52726e1db9d8d.camel@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 3/9/22 13:31, Maxim Levitsky wrote:

Question: is it worth it? Since I am very busy with various things, this feature,
beeing just small debug help which I used once in a while doesn't get much time from me.


I agree it's not very much worth.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Sean Christopherson

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: my debug patch queue
  - From: Maxim Levitsky
- [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Maxim Levitsky
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Sean Christopherson
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Maxim Levitsky
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Sean Christopherson
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
  - From: Maxim Levitsky

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: x86: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/xen: PV oneshot timer fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]