Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: Replace bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2022-03-05 at 20:44 -0500, Henry Sloan wrote:
> I agree the bool conversion should be a separate patch. Would it be proper
> to resubmit the whole patchset with a new, seventh patch containing the
> bool conversion? If I was to do so, should all of those patches be labelled
> v2, but without any changelogs since none of the present patches will have
> been changed?

Generally yes, but it depends on the upstream maintainer's preference.

Ideally:

o a 0/n patch cover letter could be used to describe the change/addition
o each proposed patch has a patch description above your Signed-off-by:






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux