Re: [Autotest PATCH] KVM test: No need close session when login timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Amos Kong" <akong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 08:28:18AM -0500, Michael Goldish wrote:
> > 
> > ----- "Amos Kong" <akong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > If login timeout, wait_for() returned 'None' and assigned to
> > > 'session'.
> > > When call session.close(), this prlblem was caused:
> > > "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'close'"
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py |    3 ++-
> > >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > b/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > index a012db3..0b93183 100644
> > > --- a/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > +++ b/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ def run_timedrift_with_migration(test, params,
> > > env):
> > >                                               time_filter_re,
> > > time_format)
> > >  
> > >      finally:
> > > -        session.close()
> > > +        if session != None:
> > > +            session.close()
> > 
> > Agreed, but we can make this simply:
> > 
> > if session:
> >     session.close()
> 
> Yes,
> 
>  
> > There's no need to explicitly check for None (and if there was,
> > the preferred syntax would be 'is not None' rather than '!= None').
> > 
> > Also, just to be safe, we should make the same modification to
> > timedrift_with_reboot.py.
> 
> 
> In timedrift_with_reboot.py, 'session' has been assigned before 'try'.
> If re-login timout, kvm_test_utils.reboot() returns nothing, the value
> of 'session' isn't changed.
> So session.close() couldn't cause this problem:
> "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'close'"

The two tests are nearly identical so I thought we might as well make
the change in both of them, but I agree that it doesn't matter (unless
we change the behavior of kvm_test_utils.reboot() in the future).

> 
> 
> 
> In other testcases, if session wasn't assigned before 'try',
> when calling kvm_test_utils.wait_for_login()/kvm_test_utils.reboot()
> timeout,
> It returns nothing, if close 'session' in finally part, Another
> problem will occur:
> "NameError: name 'session' is not defined"
> 
> In this condition,
> """ 
> if session:
>     session.close()
> """
> also causes this error.

In what tests exactly does this happen?

'if session' is preferable to 'if session is not None' because it's
shorter, not because it's safer.

> 
> 
> 
> > We can also consider removing the try..finally clauses altogether
> > because sessions are now closed automatically when they're no
> longer
> > needed.
> > 
> > >  
> > >      # Report results
> > >      host_delta = ht1 - ht0
> > > -- 
> > > 1.5.5.6
> 
> -- 
> Amos Kong
> Quality Engineer
> Raycom Office(Beijing), Red Hat Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux