On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:16 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Explicitly check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE prior to attempting to map
> the final SPTE when handling a TDP MMU fault. Functionally, this is a
> nop as tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() will eventually detect the frozen SPTE.
> Pre-checking for a REMOVED SPTE is a minor optmization, but the real goal
> is to allow tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() to have an invariant that the "old"
> SPTE is never a REMOVED SPTE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 4151e61245a7..1acd12bf309f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1250,7 +1250,11 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> }
> }
>
> - if (iter.level != fault->goal_level) {
> + /*
> + * Force the guest to retry the access if the upper level SPTEs aren't
> + * in place, or if the target leaf SPTE is frozen by another CPU.
> + */
> + if (iter.level != fault->goal_level || is_removed_spte(iter.old_spte)) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return RET_PF_RETRY;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
>
