On 2/22/22 11:40, Peng Hao wrote:
From: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Make sure nested_vmx_hardware_setup/unsetup() are called in pairs under
the same conditions. Calling nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() when nested
is false "works" right now because it only calls free_page() on zero-
initialized pointers, but it's possible that more code will be added to
nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup() in the future.
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 75ed7d6f35cc..9fad3c73395a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7852,7 +7852,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
vmx_set_cpu_caps();
r = alloc_kvm_area();
- if (r)
+ if (r && nested)
nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup();
kvm_set_posted_intr_wakeup_handler(pi_wakeup_handler);
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
