On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 18:23 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 2/18/22 18:14, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Checkpatch doesn't like it, and IMO the existing asserts > > are unnecessary. > > I agree that removing the assertions could be another way to go. > > A third and better one could be to just wait until pae_root is gone. I > have started looking at it but I would like your opinion on one detail; > see question I posted at > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/7ccb16e5-579e-b3d9-cedc-305152ef9b8f@xxxxxxxxxx/. > > For now I'll drop this patch. IMHO, the idea of having shadow pages backing the synthetic pages like pae roots, is a very good idea. I hope I get to review that RFC very soon. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky > > Paolo >
