Excerpts from Christian Borntraeger's message of February 23, 2022 7:14 pm: > > > Am 22.02.22 um 15:11 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> On 2/22/22 07:47, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>> Patch 3 requires a KVM_CAP_PPC number allocated. QEMU maintainers are >>> happy with it (link in changelog) just waiting on KVM upstreaming. Do >>> you have objections to the series going to ppc/kvm tree first, or >>> another option is you could take patch 3 alone first (it's relatively >>> independent of the other 2) and ppc/kvm gets it from you? >> >> Hi Nick, >> >> I have pushed a topic branch kvm-cap-ppc-210 to kvm.git with just the definition and documentation of the capability. ppc/kvm can apply your patch based on it (and drop the relevant parts of patch 3). I'll send it to Linus this week. > > We to have be careful with the 210 cap that was merged from the s390 tree. Ah thanks, I didn't notice it. Using 211 is no problem for me, merge will have a conflict now though. We could avoid it by just sending my patch in a second batch instead of doing the topic branch this time (I still like the idea of a topic branch for caps for future). Thanks, Nick
