From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I saw the below splatting after the host suspended and resumed.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2943 at kvm/arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:5531 kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm]
CPU: 0 PID: 2943 Comm: step_after_susp Tainted: G W IOE 5.17.0-rc3+ #4
RIP: 0010:kvm_resume+0x2c/0x30 [kvm]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
syscore_resume+0x90/0x340
suspend_devices_and_enter+0xaee/0xe90
pm_suspend.cold+0x36b/0x3c2
state_store+0x82/0xf0
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b6/0x260
new_sync_write+0x258/0x370
vfs_write+0x33f/0x510
ksys_write+0xc9/0x160
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
lockdep_is_held() can return -1 when lockdep is disabled which triggers
this warning. Let's use lockdep_assert_not_held() which can detect
incorrect calls while holding a lock and it also avoids false negatives
when lockdep is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 83c57bcc6eb6..3f861f33bfe0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -5528,7 +5528,7 @@ static void kvm_resume(void)
{
if (kvm_usage_count) {
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&kvm_count_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_not_held(&kvm_count_lock);
#endif
hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
}
--
2.25.1
