Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Mask guest fpstate->xfeatures with guest_supported_xcr0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Mask guest fpstate->xfeatures with guest_supported_xcr0
From: Leonardo Bras Soares Passos <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 03:07:21 -0300
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220208022809.575769-1-leobras@redhat.com>
References: <20220208022809.575769-1-leobras@redhat.com>

Just noticed I forgot to include the EXPORT_SYMBOL() so kvm can have
access to fpu_user_cfg.
Sorry about that.

I will send a v3 shortly.

Best regards,
Leo

References:
- [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Mask guest fpstate->xfeatures with guest_supported_xcr0
  - From: Leonardo Bras

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Fixes for kvm/queue
Next by Date: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Mask guest fpstate->xfeatures with guest_supported_xcr0
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/kvm/fpu: Mask guest fpstate->xfeatures with guest_supported_xcr0
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/7] My set of KVM unit tests + fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux