Re: [PATCH MANUALSEL 5.16 1/8] KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/9/22 19:56, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 6a0c61703e3a5d67845a4b275e1d9d7bc1b5aad7 ]

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Paolo

Fix the following false positive warning:
  =============================
  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  5.16.0-rc4+ #57 Not tainted
  -----------------------------
  arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:484 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

  other info that might help us debug this:

  rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  3 locks held by fc_vcpu 0/330:
   #0: ffff8884835fc0b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x88/0x6f0 [kvm]
   #1: ffffc90004c0bb68 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: vcpu_enter_guest+0x600/0x1860 [kvm]
   #2: ffffc90004c0c1d0 (&kvm->irq_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x36/0x180 [kvm]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 26 PID: 330 Comm: fc_vcpu 0 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4+
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57
   kvm_notify_acked_gsi+0x6b/0x70 [kvm]
   kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x8d/0x180 [kvm]
   kvm_ioapic_update_eoi+0x92/0x240 [kvm]
   kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated+0x2a/0xe0 [kvm]
   handle_apic_eoi_induced+0x3d/0x60 [kvm_intel]
   vmx_handle_exit+0x19c/0x6a0 [kvm_intel]
   vcpu_enter_guest+0x66e/0x1860 [kvm]
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x438/0x7f0 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x38a/0x6f0 [kvm]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x89/0xc0
   do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Since kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier() does synchronize_srcu(&kvm->irq_srcu),
kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list is protected by kvm->irq_srcu. In fact,
kvm->irq_srcu SRCU read lock is held in kvm_notify_acked_irq(), making it
a false positive warning. So use hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() instead of
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <f98bac4f5052bad2c26df9ad50f7019e40434512.1643265976.git.houwenlong.hwl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2ad013b8bde96..59b1dd4a549ee 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ bool kvm_irq_has_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin)
  	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);
  	gsi = kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(kvm, irqchip, pin);
  	if (gsi != -1)
-		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
-					 link)
+		hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+					  link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
  			if (kian->gsi == gsi) {
  				srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);
  				return true;
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, int gsi)
  {
  	struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian;
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
-				 link)
+	hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+				  link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
  		if (kian->gsi == gsi)
  			kian->irq_acked(kian);
  }




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux