Re: [PATCH 1/7] Nested VMX patch 1 implements vmon and vmoff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:04:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:

> >Since VMX was not originally designed to be nested that wouldn't
> >surprise me.
> 
> vmx was designed to correct the non-virtualizability of x86.  It
> would have been criminal to design it without nesting in mind,
> especially given all the prior art.
> 
> vmx does support nesting, albeit not very efficiently.

I would say that VMX only supports nesting if you define "supports" as
"does not make it impossible". The fact that VMX operations in
executed in non-root mode are trapped is welcome, but there's so much
more that could be done in hardware to make nesting "better supported"
that I would hesitate to say that the current generation of VMX
supports nesting.

Cheers,
Muli
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda | muli@xxxxxxxxxx | +972-4-8281080
Manager, Virtualization and Systems Architecture
Master Inventor, IBM Research -- Haifa
Second Workshop on I/O Virtualization (WIOV '10):
http://sysrun.haifa.il.ibm.com/hrl/wiov2010/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux