[PATCH RESEND 17/30] KVM: x86: mmu: trace kvm_mmu_set_spte after the new SPTE was set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It makes more sense to print new SPTE value than the
old value.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 296f8723f9ae9..43c7abdd6b70f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2708,8 +2708,8 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	if (*sptep == spte) {
 		ret = RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
 	} else {
-		trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
 		flush |= mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+		trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
 	}
 
 	if (wrprot) {
-- 
2.26.3




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux