On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:50:37 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28.01.22 19:54, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Knowing the number of active CPUs is not enough to know which ones are
> > active. This patch adds 2 new functions:
> >
> > * smp_cpu_addr_from_idx to get the CPU address from the index
> > * smp_cpu_from_idx allows to retrieve the struct cpu from the index
> >
> > This makes it possible for tests to avoid hardcoding the CPU addresses.
> > It is useful in cases where the address and the index might not match.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > lib/s390x/smp.h | 2 ++
> > lib/s390x/smp.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/s390x/smp.h b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> > index a2609f11..69aa4003 100644
> > --- a/lib/s390x/smp.h
> > +++ b/lib/s390x/smp.h
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_status {
> >
> > int smp_query_num_cpus(void);
> > struct cpu *smp_cpu_from_addr(uint16_t addr);
> > +struct cpu *smp_cpu_from_idx(uint16_t addr);
>
> s/addr/idx/
>
>
oops!
will fix
