On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:56 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Note: gcc-10 had a bug with the symbolic references to labels when > > using tied constraints. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096 > > > > Both compilers had bugs here, and it may be worth mentioning that in > > the commit message. > > Is this wording accurate? > > gcc also had a similar bug[3], fixed in gcc-11, where gcc failed to > account for its behavior of assigning two numbers to tied outputs (one > for input, one for output) when evaluating symbolic references. SGTM -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
