On 12/10/2009 08:38 PM, oritw@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Orit Wasserman<oritw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Missing changelog entry. Please use the format common to all kvm patches.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 3de0b37..3f63cdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ static int npt = 1;
module_param(npt, int, S_IRUGO);
-static int nested = 1;
-module_param(nested, int, S_IRUGO);
-
Separate moving 'nested' into a different patch.
+struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) level_state {
+};
+
+struct nested_vmx {
+ /* Has the level1 guest done vmxon? */
+ bool vmxon;
+ /* Level 1 state for switching to level 2 and back */
+ struct level_state *l1_state;
If this doesn't grow too large, can keep it as a member instead of a
pointer.
+};
+
static inline struct vcpu_vmx *to_vmx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -201,6 +214,7 @@ static struct kvm_vmx_segment_field {
static u64 host_efer;
static void ept_save_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+static int create_l1_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
/*
* Keep MSR_K6_STAR at the end, as setup_msrs() will try to optimize it
@@ -961,6 +975,95 @@ static void guest_write_tsc(u64 guest_tsc, u64 host_tsc)
}
/*
+ * Handles msr read for nested virtualization
+ */
+static int nested_vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index,
+ u64 *pdata)
+{
+ u64 vmx_msr = 0;
+
+ switch (msr_index) {
+ case MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL:
+ *pdata = 0;
+ break;
+ case MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC:
+ *pdata = 0;
Not needed.
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC, vmx_msr);
+ *pdata = (vmx_msr& 0x00ffffcfffffffff);
Please use symbolic constants.
+ break;
+ case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS, vmx_msr);
+ *pdata = (PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK& vmcs_config.pin_based_exec_ctrl) |
+ (PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING& vmcs_config.pin_based_exec_ctrl) |
+ (PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS& vmcs_config.pin_based_exec_ctrl);
Don't understand. You read vmx_msr and then use vmcs_config?
+ case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS:
+ {
+ u32 vmx_msr_high, vmx_msr_low;
+ u32 control = CPU_BASED_HLT_EXITING |
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING |
+ CPU_BASED_CR8_STORE_EXITING |
+#endif
+ CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING |
+ CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING |
+ CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
+ CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING |
+ CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING |
+ CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING |
+ CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW |
+ CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS |
+ CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS;
+
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS, vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high);
+
+ control&= vmx_msr_high; /* bit == 0 in high word ==> must be zero */
+ control |= vmx_msr_low; /* bit == 1 in low word ==> must be one */
+
+ *pdata = (CPU_BASED_HLT_EXITING& control) |
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ (CPU_BASED_CR8_LOAD_EXITING& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_CR8_STORE_EXITING& control) |
+#endif
+ (CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING& control) |
+ (CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING& control) ;
What about the high word of the msr? Will it always allow 0?
/*
+ * Writes msr value for nested virtualization
+ * Returns 0 on success, non-0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int nested_vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 data)
+{
+ switch (msr_index) {
+ case MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL:
+ if ((data& (FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED |
+ FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED))
+ != (FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED |
+ FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED))
+ return 1;
+ break;
Need to trap if unsupported bits are set.
Need a way for userspace to write these msrs, so that live migration to
an older kvm can work. We do the same thing with cpuid - userspace sets
cpuid to values that are common across the migration cluster.
+static void free_l1_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+
+ if (!vmx->nested.l1_state)
+ return;
Check isn't needed, kfree() likes NULLs.
+
+ kfree(vmx->nested.l1_state);
+ vmx->nested.l1_state = NULL;
+}
+
+
struct kvm_shared_msrs_global {
@@ -505,7 +509,7 @@ void kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
return;
}
- if (cr4& X86_CR4_VMXE) {
+ if (cr4& X86_CR4_VMXE&& !nested) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "set_cr4: #GP, setting VMXE\n");
kvm_inject_gp(vcpu, 0);
return;
Some bits are required to be set when VMXE is enabled.
Please split the MSR changes into a separate patch. Even cr4 is better
on its own.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html