Reiji discovered multiple issues with the vgic_irq series [0]: 1. there's an assert that needs fixing. 2. some guest arguments are not set correctly. 3. the failure test in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check is wrong. 4. there are lots of comments that use the wrong formatting. 5. vgic_poke_irq() could use a tighter assert check. The first 3 issues above are critical, the last 2 would be nice to have. I haven't hit the failed assert (1.), but just by chance: my compiler is initializing the respective local variable to 0. The second issue (2.) leads to not testing one of the injection methods (irqfd). The third issue could be hit if we tested more intids. v1 -> v2: - adding 3 more fixes: 2, 3, 5 above. (Reiji) - corrected the comments in 4 above. (Andrew) - dded drjones@ reviewed-by tag. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/164072141023.1027791.3183483860602648119.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/ Ricardo Koller (5): kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg kvm: selftests: aarch64: pass vgic_irq guest args as a pointer kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments kvm: selftests: aarch64: use a tighter assert in vgic_poke_irq() .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c | 45 +++++++++++-------- .../selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c | 12 ++--- .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c | 9 ++-- 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
