WARN if KVM attempts to allocate a shadow VMCS for vmcs02. KVM emulates
VMCS shadowing but doesn't virtualize it, i.e. KVM should never allocate
a "real" shadow VMCS for L2.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index f235f77cbc03..92ee0d821a06 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -4851,18 +4851,20 @@ static struct vmcs *alloc_shadow_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs = vmx->loaded_vmcs;
/*
- * We should allocate a shadow vmcs for vmcs01 only when L1
- * executes VMXON and free it when L1 executes VMXOFF.
- * As it is invalid to execute VMXON twice, we shouldn't reach
- * here when vmcs01 already have an allocated shadow vmcs.
+ * KVM allocates a shadow VMCS only when L1 executes VMXON and frees it
+ * when L1 executes VMXOFF or the vCPU is forced out of nested
+ * operation. VMXON faults if the CPU is already post-VMXON, so it
+ * should be impossible to already have an allocated shadow VMCS. KVM
+ * doesn't support virtualization of VMCS shadowing, so vmcs01 should
+ * always be the loaded VMCS.
*/
- WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs == &vmx->vmcs01 && loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
+ if (WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs != &vmx->vmcs01 || loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs))
+ return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
+
+ loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
+ if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
+ vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
- if (!loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs) {
- loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
- if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
- vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
- }
return loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs;
}
base-commit: edb9e50dbe18394d0fc9d0494f5b6046fc912d33
--
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
