On 1/14/22 21:31, Matthew Rosato wrote:
KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP relays whether zPCI interpretive
execution is possible based on the available hardware facilities.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 7a6b14874d65..ed06458a871f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_machine {
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI 11
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF 12
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS 13
+#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP 14
struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_feat {
__u64 feat[16];
};
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index b6c32fc3b272..3ed59fe512dd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
if (test_facility(151)) /* DFLTCC */
__insn32_query(INSN_DFLTCC, kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc);
+ if (test_facility(69) && test_facility(70) && test_facility(71) &&
+ test_facility(72)) /* zPCI Interpretation */
+ allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP);
+
Don't we want to start the support of ZPCI interpretation starting with
Z14 ?
if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP)
allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP);
/*
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
